Unfortunately most Astronomy books don't even mention the existence of Astrology. Most Astronomers just ignore the subject with no true examination ,only a scientific holier than thou attitude. It should be noted that many of the early accepted unquestioned ideas of Astronomy have been proved wrong in the past.[Eumenides note: the following article is long.]Astrology - a look at the evidence
===========================================================================
THINGS MOST SKEPTICS DON'T KNOW ABOUT ASTROLOGY:
- 1. Astrology probably gave birth to Astronomy. There is nothing supernatural about casting a horoscope, most of it is done according to precise astronomical and mathematical principles.
- 2. Many famous scientists have been into Astrology: Tyco Brahe, Kepler, Huxley, and Copernicus.. Many others remain anonymous.
- 3. Astrologers do not necessarily believe in fate. They believe the stars impel not compel.
- 4. There are 10,000 practicing paid Astrologers and millions of horoscope followers. There are hundreds of books on the topic. Only 10% of Americans believe there can't be anything to it.
- 5. Astrology doesn't have to involve psychic phenomenon or even direct causation. Many Astrologers believe in a natural synchronicity between the stars and events. Other countries place even more value in it.
- 6. It is a undisputed scientific fact that the planets have a measurable magnetic, gravitational and electromagnetic influence on the earth. Most people agree that bizarre behavior tends to peak on full moons.
- 7. Astrology is not limited to natal. There is also electional, horary, mundane, medical, meteorological, Chinese 12 year and millennial.
- 8. The vast majority of those who look at their own chart (not just a newspaper column) find uncanny accurate hits.
- 9. There are scores of natural phenomenon with regular periodicity's
THINGS THAT DON'T DISPROVE
ASTROLOGY
______________________________________
Brief Astrological statement:
Astrology was founded in belief of many
mythical deity images. It's
been around for millennia in many contradicting forms. It seems
to be sustained
largely among women who selectively remember hits and like
hearing about
themselves. Scientific studies on different astrological scheme
have found
no ability to predict personality type, marital success or
deaths.
PROBLEMS SKEPTICS SEE WITH ASTROLOGY:
1. Its development was based in Geocentrism and an abandoned polytheistic religion of quirky gods.
2. Astrological signs have no relation to planet activity in the named constellations. (for the prevailing tropical Astrological scheme)
3. Lack of universally accepted
conventions:
5. If there is some known or unknown
force that the physical planets
could have on humans, how would it selectively affect those born
at a
certain timeplace.
6. Would not the instant of conception
be better for natal Astrology,
since that is when the genetic dice is cast? Is not the exact
instant of
birth an after fact to embryonic development since an 8 month
fetus is
viable and considered by many to be a sentient womb-bound human
being?
What special properties does a womb have to temporarily shield
Astrological
effects?. Wouldn't two people born at the same instant have
major differences
accountable by their genetic make up, culture, religion and
health?
7. What about people born within the
arctic and Antarctic circles who have no
diurnal arc and no astrological information?
8. If the planets influence us, how can
we be sure that they were named
correctly and ascribed with the correct attributes from the
correct
ancient deity?
9. Why didn't earlier famous
Astrologers note the inaccuracies resulting
from not taking into account the influences of Uranus, Neptune
and Pluto?
10. Would 'Natal discrimination' be as
bad as racial, sex, age, or national
origin discrimination. (IE to not hire or date someone based on
birth date?)
11. Since the distance of planets is
not taken into consideration, is the
unknown Astrological force totally independent of distance? And
if so, should
Astrology take into account distant nebula, stars and planets.
Is there an
Astrologic effect from the asteroid belt, the space shuttle,
moons on other
planets, comets, solar flares, or interstellar dust clouds.
12. Most "scientific support"
offered by Astrologers is faulty. The Gaugaughlin
study disproved conventional astrology - but it's claim of a
Mars correlation with
sports is unfounded. There is no evidence of more strangeness of
any kind
on full moons.
Like many paranormal claims: if true,
it deserves greater study and usage to
benefit humanity; if false, it has caused many people to waste
time and make
wrong decisions.
HUMAN WEAKNESSES SUPPORTING ASTROLOGY: 1. People love to hear about themselves -especially women. -some astrologers act as shrinks to to people who would feel a stigma about going to psychotherapist 2. We all want a single source for easy truth. 3. We'd love to know what the future holds, and we want to think there's a grand plan, not randomness. 4. We remember meaningful coincidences and ignore misses. 5. We think our own situation and problems are very unique. 6. We love the exciting promises, not difficult boring prosaic explanations. 7. Once we've invested in something, it's hard to admit a mistake. 8. 2nd try fallacy -you can take a difficult to calculate prediction scheme -fail to get a match -and then be very impressed when you try again and get a better hit by chance. 9. A technologically bewildering world can nurture a "human" backlash against cold rationalism. 10. We love mystery (note popularity of shows and books about unexplained vs popularity of skeptical publications) 11. Individuals often fall prey to self-fulfilling prophecy - if they think something will happen, they subtly cause it to happen . If you wake up expecting a bad day - guess what? (this phenomenon is well harnessed living with "power of positive thinking") 12. Studies have shown we are easily lead by suggestion. "you had a tough day, didn't you?"
great - now you're done - please rate this horoscope 1 - 5 according to the following scale:
1. That's amazing, this is me
2. Still good, but missed on a few
3. that could be me
4. not too hot
5. I don't know who that was about - but it wasn't me.
"Men will cease to commit atrocities only when they cease to believe absurdities" - Voltaire